« exciting morning | Main | the La Brea tar pits »

October 29, 2006

the elephant in the room

From the NYT:

Stephen Viscusi, 46, of Manhattan, said the divide has made dating even more fraught. Mr. Viscusi, who is gay and a Republican, said he has been rejected by Democratic suitors once they learn his political views.
Where people were once amused by the marriage of the Republican consultant Mary Matalin and her Democratic husband, James Carville, now they are fairly bewildered: These days, it is almost impossible to imagine a similar union springing up in Washington, or between any two people on opposite political sides.

This article regarding the political boundaries in daily life between red and the blue voters is interesting -- but for those of us who are conservative, the contents will not be surprising.

The article reminded me of a great 2004 piece researched and written by Richard Rushfield (who in real life is delightfully detached from politics).

But back to the NYT's article, not that long ago I went on a date with a man who described himself as "ultra conservative". So obviously when I met him, I was excited to reveal that I was also conservative and then settle into getting to know more about him.

Long story short, here's what happened after we ordered some food:

Me: I'm so happy to meet another conservative! There aren't many of us in Los Angeles.

Him: I don't know what you are talking about. That's not a good topic.

Me: Oh, I don't want to talk politics, only wanted to mention that we're on the same page.

Him: What are you talking about? You're a fucking crazy bitch.

Obviously, he was a knee-jerk lefty, one that accidentally clicked "ultra conservative" on his match.com profile.

Nothing else was said after he snapped at me, mainly because he walked out on dinner -- thankfully by the time I got home he had sent a three page screed which entertains me to this day. I will excerpt it below. Please excuse the typos, this is a Democrapper who never finished High School but he does get an A for imagination:

"First, I know why you only show your profile...HR Puff and Stuff (witchy Poo) that is you to the Nth degree. That is besides the point of your nose. My god...you almost poked my eye out before I reached you...seriously, surgery is in order...but make that way down the list. Your other issues come way before that. Jesus, women...you could cut glass! uuuuggggggggg

But...the fact that you are a narrow minded, bitter, ignorant, tart ass, unintelligent, white trash piece of crap is amazing to me...I have to pay for this shit...GET OFF THIS AND ALL SITES NOW!
You are the reason there is Reality TV..you really are that stupid. My God, I wish I would have taped what the Frick came out of your sorry for an excuse mouth!

Do you know how stupid you are...seriously...you are the most ignorant person I have ever met in my life (I am 42) apparently everybody you have met does as well! You are an embarrassment to all women who have fought to get the respect they deserve...you are the Jesse Jackson for women!

This is how sorry for an excuse you are...YOU GOT LEFT AT A RESTAURANTE...WALKED OUT ON!!!! EVERYBODY THAT SAW YOU THERE WITH ME...SAW ME LEAVE YOUR NEO-NAZI STUPID ASS. Me, of all people....a person who respects and gets along with everybody! I could have and should have left you with the bill...but that would have brainwashed (you don't have a brain, it is a figure of speech) even more so than what you are.

AGAIN: TAKE YOUR SHIT OFF OF THESE SITES...SERIOUSLY. YOU DON'T BELONG HERE...YOU ARE NO MATCH WITH ANYBODY. You are an accident waiting to happen.
You are the equilavent to a RACIST...call MEL ASAP!

I AM SO DISGUSTED WITH WASTING MY TIME WITH A PERSON THAT IS SO BENEATH ME OR ANY MAN or WOMEN. IT IS DISGUSTING! YOU ARE DISGUSTING!"

The whole email was amazing to me, because we spent a grand total of 10 minutes together, most of which was ordering the food. Once he left of course, the two gentlemen at the table next to me asked me to join them -- marveling, they could hear everything -- and couldn't understand what made him so angry.

Because I'm conservative! They said, "so what? Eat with us at our table." And I did. It was very clear, there is no way I'd let someone like that ruin my evening.

As anyone who has read this blog will know, this was not the first time I went on a date with an open minded, tolerant liberal who soiled his panties over my politics.

Regardless, I'm working on a top secret project and you can help!

If any of you have a question about how to deal with a person whose politics are contrary to your own, please send me an email (as in, do not leave your questions in the comments). Doesn't have to be a dating situation, it can be a relative, friend or co-worker. You can even be a liberal with a question about us VRWC wackos.

I will answer your questions in future posts. Neither your name nor email address will be made public, of course.

Happy Sunday!

PS: The Remedy notes something I did too, but forgot to mention,

"This Anne Kornblut NYT piece on the fraying of friendships and relationships between Democrats and Republicans has both the ring of truth and a rather troubling subtext: every person in the piece who actively rejects a friend or family member over politics is a Democrat."

Posted by Moxie at October 29, 2006 12:28 PM |icon_su.gifStumble It! |85x10-digg-link.gif | del.icio.us

Comments

y'know, a reaction like his would seem more closely linked to him being a nutjob than a liberal, don'tcha think? . . . like i know a few people whose reactions to things tend to be out of proportion to what the cultural norm would be, and while, yes, i'd assume most of 'em are probably liberal, it's not 'cuz i think there's a direct correlation, but only because i live in california and there's just a larger concentration of liberals here. . .

also, i was wondering (i really don't know as i've never tried a dating service) if there tends to be a noticably higher concentration of the societal fringe element when it comes to dating services as i'd imagine they'd have a higher-than-average percentage of people using it as a last resort. . .

note that i'm not saying *you're* a psycho nutjob freak (of course i've never actually met you so i suppose it's possible you're some 50-year-old pedophile with a gut and a bud sitting in front of a packard bell in a trailer park), i'm just wondering if the fringe is more widely represented in places like match.com. . .

Posted by: bloopy at October 29, 2006 5:05 PM

I had a leftie love for a while, but she was actually insane regardless of her beliefs, although I suspect that the two were related.

Posted by: Damian G. at October 29, 2006 6:37 PM

This is pretty simple. Cricket bat to the base of the skull. Anyone whom treats you like that again, leme know. I'd like to- er, inform them of the error of their ways.

Posted by: og at October 29, 2006 7:04 PM

"i'm just wondering if the fringe is more widely represented in places like match.com"

Living in a state where being right-of-center is considered to be on the "fringe", I believe that is what Moxie is counting on.

If the online methods don't work, I guess she could try looking around at local church singles groups. Hopefully, they all won't be intolerant, proselytizing assholes.

Posted by: reagan80 at October 29, 2006 7:33 PM

99.9% of the women I've dated throughout my life just happened to be conservatives. This from someone born and raised in Manhattan, so it was not as if I was tripping over them on every street corner. Kismet, luck, animule magnetism, dunno. Traveling extensively saw the same returns. Guess opposites really don't attract.

Posted by: Fits at October 29, 2006 8:02 PM

It would appear to me that it may have been a purposeful act on his part to set up a date with a conservative in order to get his kicks walking out on you and then writing that diatribe in an attempt to hurt your feelings. I guess killing babies just doesn't give the same kicks it used to and now libshits must resort to such sophmoric behavior to get their rocks off.

Aloha

Posted by: Spearmedic at October 29, 2006 9:06 PM

I gotta go with og here... I don't know who this a-hole is and I don't even know you much Moxie, but I do know you're a woman and I assume this guy has male genitalia (although it can no doubt hardly be considered as such) so for him to say or write those kinds of things to you - - I’d love to bust him in the face. The idea that it’s okay to assail a woman verbally or otherwise in such a way irks me to the bone. I wish I could avenge you for such an indignity.

Posted by: JimmJamm at October 29, 2006 10:23 PM

Yes, I think there are more lunatic fringe characters on these dating sites than you'd meet at say, your office or through a church group. But when you have the sort of job I have, it's one of few options.

Regarding the "he did this intentionally" theories -- I'd have to say that is unlikely. Besides not knowing I was conservative, he seemed mentally incapable of formulating such a devious plan. It was hard enough for him to form and speak a full sentence.


Posted by: Moxie at October 29, 2006 11:39 PM

Jesus Christ. I've never wanted to pound someone's face into a pulp so badly in my life.

Posted by: evariste at October 30, 2006 2:44 AM

Moxie,

If you are ever in Florida let me know :)

Will happily spring for dinner.

Another conservative.

Posted by: Ed at October 30, 2006 10:21 AM

E-Harmony.com sucks. That is all.

Posted by: Mike in S.A. at October 30, 2006 11:17 AM

My wife is a "nature cookie/lib", I'm a little to the right of Gengis Khan. We each have issues that we are passionate about. We don't discuss those very often because we know neither will convince/convert the other. We do agree not to actively subvert the others hot-button issues with contrary donations. I stay out of reproductive rights, she stays out of Second Amendment. Worked for 16 years so far.

Posted by: Baddog at October 30, 2006 2:34 PM

Wow, I can't believe that you tried to meet a guy through one of those screwy on-line dating rip-offs. I'm registered with a couple of them, but only on the off chance I might reconnect with people from the past through them. You can't believe half the things people say on those things, including, by the way, the things I say on them.

Besides, you need a liberal guy. Haven't you heard that old saying that oppossites attract? By the way, when this guy said he was ultra-conservative, he was probably not referring to politics,he was probably trying to put himself across as a person who believed in old fashioned, traditional relationships, blah, blah, blah.

Remember-not half of what they say.

Posted by: PatrickKelley at October 30, 2006 9:02 PM

Okay, I read his rant and I think I see what the problem was, at least in part. Aren't you like close to twenty years younger than this guy? And despite what he said, you're obviously intelligent, and that's something he can't deal with. It's likely that he has it in his head that conservative women are the kind that stay home all day, clean house, cook, have babies, ergo, lots of sex, and devote their time to trying to please their man. That's what he was after, and it didn't take him long to figure out you weren't quite as empty headed and shallow as he considers conservaive women to be, and he just couldn't deal with it.

What a fucking loser.

Posted by: PatrickKelley at October 30, 2006 9:12 PM

Wow, I can't believe that you tried to meet a guy through one of those screwy on-line dating rip-offs.

Well, when YOU have job that requires you to deal with only A)models or B)no one, then perhaps you'll understand my motivation.

In general, I'm not that interested in dating, to be honest. Dating and marriage both seem like a recipe for divorce and disaster.

Posted by: Moxie at October 31, 2006 3:31 AM

That's true. But the problem is in trying to meet somebody. When somebody sets out to meet mr or miss right they automatically shroud themselves in the illussion they want the person to see, and the other party does likewise. It's just natural to do that. A lot better when you meet somebody just on the spur of the moment, it's too all of a sudden to put up those kinds of pretenses that are in reality barriers to really getting to know a person, and that person getting to know you. Thus, the feelings that develop in a more spontaneous relationship are more likely to be genuine.

As for models, all I can say to that is by way of paraphrasing something I know a lot of women tell their daughters. "It's just as easy to fall in love with a good looking person as it is a plain one."

Posted by: PatrickKelley at October 31, 2006 5:01 AM

Fine, fine. 99% of the models I work with are women. And I like men.

Anyway, you guys know I've posted more recently, right? If you use Firefox, you have to hit control-refresh.

Posted by: Moxie at October 31, 2006 5:06 AM

Some of us only catch up here every few days, I guess. After reading your post, I just checked out Match on my long-dormant account, and remembered again why I let it go dark.

Searching on the basic criteria (age range, body type prefs, no kids, nonsmoker, occasional/regular drinker), limiting the distance to within 15 miles of where I live (SF) and checking the "conservative" and "ultra conservative" boxes yielded me a grand total of about a dozen results. Half of those I didn't find attractive; of the remainder, half described themselves as very religious (including the one who was wearing a see-through T-shirt and no bra in her main photo), which is going to be an incompatibility for me. Three potential matches doesn't really seem worth the subscription fee.

Posted by: Alex at October 31, 2006 8:39 AM

For some reason, a lot of so-called "liberals" seem to think it is perfectly acceptable to tee off on conservatives. It appears to me that at least some of them are doing this to minimize the cognitive dissonance from their own authoritarian tendencies. I find this deeply distressing.

A co-worker drives a Volvo. When he had "W '04" stickers on it, he got a lot of very hostile reactions from other drivers. I'm guessing they couldn't wrap their minds around a conservative driving a Volvo.

Posted by: Dishman at October 31, 2006 9:18 AM

Hey Mox, maybe he thought that this super hot bitch is way outta my leaque. Gotta come up with something fast before I suffer some pre-e.

Posted by: Stu at October 31, 2006 12:21 PM

Dating and marriage both seem like a recipe for divorce and disaster.

I agree.

Posted by: Mike in S.A. at October 31, 2006 4:54 PM

Judging by the quality of his spelling, grammar and syntax, he obviously didn't discover his left-leaning tendencies at any college or university anywhere in the English-speaking world.

Possibly, there are a few places still specialising in pidgin English - Papua-New Guinea, perhaps, or that new correspondence job in Burkina Faso - but I suspect I might be on the wrong track there as most people can understand pidgin, particularly if they concentrate.

Or at 42, could it simply be early-onset Alzheimer's? Either way, and regardless of your diverse political views, leaving you at the restaurant makes him a cad of the highest order, and one who needs comeuppance. He could at least have stayed there and argued with you all night.

You are indeed well rid of the man.

Posted by: SM at October 31, 2006 9:23 PM

I freelance commercial art, graphic design, and the like, as well as work in fine arts, so most of my social circle--if I have such a thing given the time I spend in my studio or hunched over my keyboard--consists of far-left-leaning artsy types. Many of the people I count as friends are liberals, and most of the women I've dated/continue to date are liberals. How do I do it? I don't hide my conservative beliefs any more than I hide my religious faith, but I don't wear it on my sleeve, either--nor do I seek out argument, knowing most of my liberal acquaintances seek affirmation, not reasoned debate. If pressed, I tell friends (and romantic interests) that I believe in objective truth, that all of my political views and positions on the issues are carefully considered, and that while I almost always vote straight-ticket Republican, I would vote for Democratic candidate if I genuinely thought that candidate superior in character and principle to his or her opponent--although Harry Truman isn't likely to rise from the dead anytime soon. That explanation generally satisfies both liberal friends and women I'm dating. That said, crazed whacko moonbats are another matter entirely. Of course, I'm talking about thoughtful people, not one-dimensional fanatics. Good people can disagree on any number of things.

Good luck with online dating services, Moxie. I quit doing them altogether after a few very bad experiences, but I have a friend who found his wife online and they're very happy together, so I know that it can work. Just not for me.

Posted by: troyriser at November 2, 2006 5:35 PM